Sunday, 5 January 2020

Educational approach of extension

Educational approach of extension:

Non-formal education, which has advantage over the formal education for educating farming community, has many advantages. The approach raises the following questions also:
a.     Is the time scheduled for imparting education in non-formal way is sufficient?
b.     How much hands on experience is being provided to trainees?
c.     Is it that learners are feeling it as more of theoretical inputs rather than practical?
d.     Is it that in real sense farmers are being educated?
e.     Does the duration of training justify the concept to be trained?
f.      Are there any pedagogical studies which justify the approach and duration adopted?
g.     What was the logic behind adopting the said method for imparting education?

For answering these questions there is need for understanding educational approach of extension. Education per se is not having any implications, until and unless it transforms the components of behavior. What kind of transformations are intended? Modification in Cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains.

1.     Cognitive domain: It involves cognitive modifications; it is the process of knowing, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation. The actual sequence of which as per Blooms taxonomy is creating (out of synthesis), evaluation, analysis, application, understanding (comprehension) and remembering (knowledge). Every technology dissemination process and educational intervention has to undergo these processes.

Three levels of knowledge are
a.     Factual knowledge: the essential components of technology the learner should know about. Then only he/she will become acquainted with the problem and become capable to solve the problems
b.     Conceptual knowledge: the inter-relationships between the essential components of technology. Understanding of which helps in implementing the solutions in an effective manner.
c.     Procedural knowledge: deals with modus operandi of technology, reasoning the utilization of technology, logical understanding of operations.

2.     Affective domain: the approach/way technology is being handled with emotions. Which is, inclusive of enthusiasm of source and receiver, motivations, attitudes, value systems and appreciation of technological intervention. These complex issues can better be explained with simple behavioural ephemeron (Bloom 1956):
a.     Receiving phenomena: conscious hearing to others for the purpose of remembering. The key issue is willingness to listen, its responsibility of source to bring the listener to the level, grab his attention, make him aware of, ask questions if doubts exist, follow the contents and understand for application.
b.     Respond to the phenomena: depicts the dynamic participation of end user. Learning outcomes lead to action/application.
c.     Valuing phenomena: reveals the ability to solve the problems. In regular interaction with both upper and lower sections of profession. Propose a plan for social improvement and commitment to implement it.
d.     Organizational phenomena: educates to establish balance between systematic ways adopted to solve problem and follow professional ethical standards.
e.     Characterization (Internalization of values) phenomena: adopting instructional objectives commensurate with learners patterns adjustment to the learning situation.
3.     Psychomotor domain: deals with skill aspects of learning. Educational interventions lead to physical movement, coordination and use of acquired skills. The skills range from manual/mechanical tasks to machine operated tasks. These skills are quantified (measured) in terms of speed of performance/execution, precision in implementation, distance covered and methods/procedures used in implementation.

The categories of skill phenomena include (Dave 1975):
a.     Imitation phenomena: observation leading to following behavioural pattern of somebody.  Reproduction of others methods, processes, skills etc. Though it is a method of acquiring skill, in the long run yields low quality and productivity.
b.     Manipulation phenomena: begins with recalling memory of things learnt during educational efforts. Based on memory, individual makes an effort to perform certain actions by following instructions.
c.     Precision phenomena: performing a skill with high degree of accuracy. Get rid of impurities to be more exact/correct.
d.     Articulation phenomena: establishing coordination between a series of skills to produce desirable product. Every operation in agriculture and allied sciences involves a series of activities involving skills. It needs perfect coordination between various sub units of a particular operation.
e.     Naturalization phenomena: running behind a particular skill until mastery is achieved in performing. Regular and continuous practice leads to naturalization of skill. The ultimate output is achieving high level of skill performance.

Educational approach of extension should achieve these phenomenons. Otherwise we are only running behind the physical targets without achieving the real output. In a country which is predominantly agriculture based and more than 70 per cent population residing in rural areas and more than 55 per cent population still derive their livelihood from agriculture and allied enterprises, the need of the hour is to adopt appropriate extension educational efforts. One such mode is being discussed here.

There are number of training programmes being organized throughout the year for farmers’ by various institutions. Duration of these training varies from one day to one month, except in few cases where trainings are more than a month. Majority training programmes for farmers are of one day to one week. The questions arise regarding the method adopted for imparting training are as under:
a.     Whether the stakeholders demanded for the training?
b.     Did the institution analyze the needs before organizing the training?
c.     Whether the resource persons were arranged as per the demands of the learners?
d.     Who decided the duration of training/educational efforts?
e.     What was the modus operandi of selection of trainees?
f.      Whether pre-test regarding the knowledge of trainees was done?
g.     What kind of care was taken in accomplishing the demands of trainees?
h.     How much time was devoted for imparting skills?
i.      Was there an inventory of skills to be imparted prepared?
j.      What kind of cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains of education can be achieved during the training period? And so on…

To take care of such situation, an approach of imparting appropriate education for the intended farming communities are being presented here.

As a part of various projects funded by ICAR/DST/DBT/CGIAR institutions/GOvt bodies/Union or state Govt. projects etc. invariably involve components like selection of farmers, training of farmers, conducting demonstration in farmers’ filed etc. Looking into the project intervention and institutional needs, every research and development institution including SAUs employ a number of farm labourers. Either the labour is permanent employee of an institution, contractual labour or daily wage employee.

To achieve the domains of cognition, affective and psychomotor there needs to be involvement of trainee. Hence half of the requirement of labour can be acquired through project mode for which the modus operandi may be as follows:

1.     There is need for evolving institutional mechanism to hire half of labour requirement of an institution from project mode.
2.     Such labour selected from projects is basically for imparting training for a period of not less than 3 months.
3.     Youth should be given preference in selecting the trainees (up to 35 years of age)
4.     They should be given accommodation at institution and labour wages as per norms
5.     While they are working as farm labour they will get practical exposure to various aspects under experimentation in the institution.
6.     He may be attached to different units for imparting exposure to various research interventions and its possible applications at filed level.
7.     Depending on the need and interest of learner time duration may be increased or decreased.
8.     Based on their learning’s they may be asked to assess the financial support required to implement their innovative ideas in their respective fields
9.     Bank linkages may be established before he leaves the  campus to his native place.
10.  Hand holding support may be extended to potential learners

This model seems to achieve the real expectation of training rather than existing models. May be on trial basis the initiative be implemented on experimental basis in selected institutions. Later extended to rest of institutions.

Can Extension service be justified by showing photographs?

The trending scene in many of presentations related to agriculture and allied sciences at national and international level is arrange for good quality photographs and justify it as extension service. Is it going to justify extension service? Thumb rule of journalism reveals that, a picture is worth thousand words. Pictures always says truth. But pictures are not everything, specially in extension activities. Yes, it has some impact on justifying the services provided, but just photos per se have lot of limitations.

The missing factor in majority of extension services is educational role of extension services. If you observe nature of extension service programmes, many/all of them run behind the numbers. Ultimately target orientation in services. Every programme/project claims that we have trained a number of training programmes, conducted so many demonstrations, organized so many field days, farmers fair etc in which so many number of people participated. Everywhere it is number game. What are the implications of these numbers we find in the reports? As per the mandate of KVKs every KVK has to organize about 100 training programmes in an year, means almost every third day there is a training programme. On an average every training programme has 25 farmers, and as on date there are 713 KVKs, means about 17 lakh farmers are getting training every year. We have about 75 SAUs and about 120 ICAR institutes, if they organize about 15 training programmes in a year about one lakh farmers are trained. Every research and development institution organize at least one kisan mela per annum. If we consider participation of about 5000 farmers in every kisan mela, it comes to about 10 lakh farmers are in contact with scientists and researchers. State Departments of Agriculture, Union Ministry of Agriculture and other International institutions also organize such events a rough estimation can be made as, about five crore farmers are in direct contact with extension institutions. The numners seems to be very encouraging, but what about educational aspects??

The Union ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare claims that more than 12 crore soil health cards are distributed to farmers. But how many farmers really understand the results of soil nutrient analysis? How many apply fertilizers as per the results of soil analysis? If not why? The amount spent in the entire efforts is secondary, the time invested by professionals in this efforts would have yielded different results if they would have adopted the educational approach in their efforts. Not only in soil health cards issue it applies to training, field days, farmers fair and so on can yield wonderful results if they would have adopted educational approach.

What is this educational approach? The simple elements, the educational approach includes is change in knowledge, change in attitude and change in skill. Creation of learning situation, use of appropriate teaching strategy, method, teaching aids, etc have a specific role to play in effective education. Its extension educationist who can suggest suitable method, aid, strategy, medium, content, analysis of audience etc which are suitable for each situation.